
by Gideon Nii Ayi
A hangover is the unpleasant physiological effects following heavy drinking of alcohol. Symptoms include headache, nausea, and thirst. Hangovers may last up to two or three days after alcohol was last consumed.
I first heard the term hangover, over (no pun intended) on the BBC. This set me thinking that perhaps Ghana (and Africa in general) is still on hangover.
During colonialism our grand parents and great-grand parents were fed on much harder stuffs, the intoxication of which is still felt today in their great grandchildren.
So what drink did Ghanaians take from the British? Certainly not palm-wine or ‘’akpeteshie’’. An ‘’akpeteshie’’ induced hangover does not last more than 2 days or so –a local ‘’quafite’’ tells me- , so how come that over 50 something years of gaining self rule we are still drunk!.
Have you ever heard or even said any of these variants yourself?
‘’the white man is a wizard’’ or
‘’as for brofo diee’’ so and so’’? ‘’ the Blackman always .....’’ ‘’this be Ghana or .. ...(fill in the blank with any African country)’’
If you have heard any of the above or even uttered yourself, then surely you are also intoxicated. The grandparents have taken the drink and their children are bearing the consequences. The reason for this intoxication is numerous but I offer only 2.
Firstly when the whites first came to our shores they were technologically advanced (and still are) and so we as a people looked up to them (and we still do) for our tech needs. For example we needed muskets and canons from them to fight our local tribal wars. So even before white rule started in Ghana, the Europeans were influencing the geo-political landscape. So if the Akwamus become a threat to the English, then in the event of a war the Akwamus would have to look for an alternate source of arms apart from the English. If the Dutch didn’t like tribe X, they would just supply tribe Y with arms to war tribe X- they thing was that musket were superior weapons and whoever had them was sure to prevail on the battle field. In effect we as Africans started looking outside for the solutions to their numerous problems.
So even at an early age we just accepted the Europeans as our technological benefactors and never made any attempt (if any at all on any significant scale) to be sufficient. This is evident today as we cannot and do not build our own means of transport (ship, rail, or cars)
I do not want to start any comparison and say Brazilians –through Embraer- build their own planes and Koreans have –Hyundai- which builds ships –sorry I already have. But I just want to analyse causes and facts without contrasting.
Secondly Europeans employed Africans to perform manual and other less reflective jobs. Usually not much was expected from an African from such a job and occasionally when we exceeded a low standard of performance set there was surprise and exclamation of ‘’ohh good job done theere…’’(with a slang at the end, or ‘’grrreeaat’’ and other doting remarks which made the poor African fellow proud and glow in his dark skin just for achieving the barest minimum. Today let IMF/World Bank or any less creditable body issue any commendation and it becomes top headlines on both the radio and TV. The thing is sometimes this approvals/citations are given because we managed to just pass the barest/minimum standard which will not hold anywhere else except in Africa but we still have not gotten over our love from commendations given by a foreigner and we earnestly crave for it.
Look within our political and social environment today and you will find a lot of people still intoxicated with the drinks that their grandparents quaffed under colonial rule.
Fact is we have forgotten or overlooked the effects of colonialism and we are going about business as usual.
Our whole outlook as a society has been affected by a clash of different cultures-we have tried Malaysian, Korean, Nordic, Indian, Chinese etc.-in fact anything but our own.
We are unsure of how to proceed.
Do we make our children speak our own language or another?.
Which part of our culture is evil and which part is progressive.**
We do not know which branch to grasp or tree to cut down,
neither the crops to plant in our own land (both literally and figuratively)
We are left groping in the dark in our quest to define ourselves
We are ever copying instead of learning.
I wish I knew the full effects of this hangover and how to reverse it
**(I am not saying all our whole culture is perfect! But no culture is entirely bad))
..absolutely agree with this Nii Ayi. IMF/World Bank handouts, just like welfare, takes away a man's strongest incentive to create and be ingenious (and that incentive is survival). They make sure they provide our governments with just enough to service debt and our leaders are happy. We need to look beyond survival and start thriving.
ReplyDeleteLet us all look to the shining example of Eritrea's eccentric but dynamic leader Isaias Aferweski. After a prolonged guerrilla struggle against the Dergue regime of Mengistu Haile Marian of Ethiopia in 1990, Eritrea officially began rebuilding as a nation. They asked former colonists Italy for assistance to build a rail network and the Italians conditioned the aid on using Italian equipment and engineers. Aferweski told them to piss off and he decided to do it on his own with his own people. Today, Eritrea may be a small country, but it is one of the most self-sufficient countries in the world. No western syndromes, no "hang overs" as Nii Ayi intelligently described.
If the larger nations on our continent could be half as courageous as Mr. Aferweski, Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah who had the same fire would be so proud. It's time for a renaissance, my fellow Africans, let's snap out of this "hangover". May God help us.
Gideon Nii Ayi…thank you very much for this thoughtful post. Our relationship with the colonial powers has been one of adulation to the point of pure drivel. It just drives me crazy when we think everything the west does is right—cos even THEY know it is not. Why is it that everything foreign is deemed superior? And this even includes “obroniwawu” from Togo.
ReplyDeleteWe hide all this by saying Ghanaians are hospitable…which in reality is only a euphemism for inferiority complex. A ghanaman will do anything…everything for that obroni but will fight over 50 pesewas with the trotro mate…do Ghanaians even tip at all?
Thanks for reminding us Gideon…that was a good read
what?? i can't believe my ears. this is the most ignorant statement i've ever heard.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, prior to any contact with Europeans, great empires flourished on our African soils. Ancient Egypt, Hannibal and his Carthage empire, the Queen of Sheba and her Abyssinian empire, and more recently, the 10th - 12th century West African empires of Ghana, Mali, Songhai, and Ashanti that produced brave warriors like Sundiata Keita, Mansa Musa and Yaa Asantewaa. (not to mention the Swahili and Bantu kingdoms of East and Southern Africa)
This statement is hypothetical but I dare say that had Europeans not rudely interfered in our civilization, a great African empire could have emerged. As with any war of attrition, the strongest would have survived and unified us all as one great empire.
Those "stupid pirates" in Somalia that you refer to are just criminals trying to make a living. There are criminals everywhere. The case of Somalia is unique in the sense that they've not had a central government since 1991. I don't see what that has to do with this discussion.
Finally, if you think Africa would be better off with European colonizers, look to the Belgian and French colonies and see how they (the Belgians and French) destroyed Rwanda, DR Congo, and Burundi. They destroyed these nations by deliberately by systematically dividing them into tribal groups based on things as ridiculous as height, skin color, income and ownership of cattle. In fact the Hutus and Tutsis actually speak the same native language (Kinyarwanda) and can only be distinguished by national IDs provided by the Belgians. This shows how cynical the Belgians were in their scheme to divide them. You've got be a pretty evil genius to divide people that speak the same language on such preposterous bases as mentioned above. This hatred ultimately culminated in the most efficient genocide of the 20th century - The Rwandan genocide. Over a million Tutsis massacred in 100 days (between April and July 1994). On average 10,000 people were murdered a day. All because of imaginary divisions created by Belgians decades earlier. There's your evidence if you think Africa is better off with Europeans.
If you think Africans can't govern themselves, then I feel very sorry for you.
First of all i can also easily see a connection between this article and the one on the council on state...
ReplyDeleteI like the author's approach to this, not insulting but very thought provoking at the same time.
For me i think lots of events have gone to show that Africa is better of without western intervention than with one.
I'd like for you to take the analysis one step further by saying in specifics what can be done in terms of the economy, health care etc etc.
Good article!