Sunday, April 19, 2009

Same sex marriage: the last Hail Mary?



by Eche Sicancu

You’d probably not have predicted it but Iowa—the archetypal traditional mid-western state—became only the third in the US to grant marriage rights to Gays and Lesbians.

As a student in Iowa I had the privilege of witnessing, what was called, a “Pride rally” in order to celebrate this event.

Since then, Vermont has gone on to legalize gay marriage and, as we know, New York Governor David Paterson is planning to introduce a bill on same marriage this week. These developments are major pointers to the fact that the global debate on same sex marriage is taking a significant turn.

In many countries homosexuality is illegal and, the activities of gays/lesbians are shrouded in brazen secrecy. Same sex couples in many places around the world risk being lynched, tortured, ridiculed, alienated, or even killed for making public their sexual orientation.

In West Africa for instance, a gay conference was banned in Ghana sometime ago by the government with the reason that “Unnatural carnal knowledge is illegal under our criminal code” while a friend of mine Theo Yakah (now at the Fletcher Scool-Tufts Unv.) who once wrote in defense of gay rights was subject to public heckling over his call for ‘stopping the culture of hate and discrimination.”

Only recently in Alabama two gay men, Milton Lindgren and Eric Hendrickes, were murdered in their home. According to police reports, this happened just for the simple fact that the men were gay. Last year Moses “Teish” Cannon a gay black man in NY was killed with a .22 caliber rifle simply because someone didn’t like his “gayness”. Similar incidents have been reported in other states and other places in Europe (especially Spain), Africa, and fundamental Islamic countries.

Nevertheless, what’s interesting is that certain well known anti-gay institutions, such as the conservative right wing movement, in the United States are beginning to warm up to the idea of gay marriage. Steven Schmidt, John McCain’s foremost campaign adviser in the last elections shocked the political world, last week, when he endorsed gay marriage at the convention of the Log Republicans.

In a forceful but thoroughly perceptive speech, Schmidt argued that “If you put public policy issues to a religious test, you risk becoming a religious party. According to him, “…in a free country, a political party cannot be viable in the long term if it is seen as a sectarian party.”

The first thing that came to mind when I first heard of the event was “You mean there’s actually a conservative event to discuss same sex marriage?” But I was in for a bigger surprise when I heard not only Schmidt but…gasp…John McCain’s daughter Megan McCain calling on the Republican Party to be ‘gay friendly” and “forget the past”. It was then that I realized how fast the tide against same sex marriage was beginning to change. When you hear voices like these, making such statements, you know something significant (with global implications) is about to happen.

As to whether this is for the good or for the bad remains to be seen. That said, a more crucial question is: Is this really going to happen? Are we going to see a world where gay marriage is going to be legalized and accepted? What kind of world will that be?

In addition, what are the arguments for or against same sex marriage? I’m not sure, but it seems much of the discussion has centered on four main issues (1) religion (2) justice or human rights (3) culture, and (4) Life, liberty/freedoms and the pursuit of happiness.

Obviously we live in remarkable times! I’ll be very much interested in finding out what your views are on this matter or what the situation is in your country. It’s a World of Opinion out there my friends, what do you think?
PS: Also please take part in the short poll on same-sex marriage at the right-hand section of the blog...Thanks!

16 comments:

  1. Why are people so scared folks: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6445337.stm

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting Etse - while I believe very strongly that gay marriage is an oxymoron because God defined marriage when He instituted/presided over the first wedding/marriage, walking Eve down the Isle of Eden to Adam and further giving instructions on how this institution should be upheld; I think it is silly to attempt to legislate what people feel in a court of law... Laws are not and will never be an effective tourniquet to regulate and/or stanch the flow of gay or non gay emotions, determining how people behave... I think society is trying in vain to address and solve a problem with causes rooted in spirituality using non spiritual means and methods and this simply wouldn't work... it is a spiritual problem which requires spiritual answers... I oppose gay marriage with all the energy that I can humanly summon but pray for the grace to love gay men and women with all the love that any man can have... they need love and light, not judgment from anybody whomsoever except God... my five cents... afeseh.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm all for same-sex marriage. Why put barriers on who people can love? And who they can be proud to claim as their spouse? Let love be a free institution! Let people be happy!

    ReplyDelete
  5. ..interesting post and interesting comments so far. America is a very huge, diverse country with a very heterogeneous population. This is a country that has struggled for years with racism. Personally, I feel that discriminating against someone based on sexual orientation is no less a crime than racism, apartheid, or whatever fancy words you can come up with.

    That being said, let's contrast this with Ghana. It is a criminal offense to be gay in Ghana and that was the official position of the government when some people attempted to hold a gay conference in the country. It's against the culture, and the religion, and as Hilary pointed out, the Bible frowns on homosexual marriage. Now is this law appropriate for Ghana? I think so. Ghana is a small country, with a fairly homogeneous cultural mix that disgusts homosexuality. I don't think we need to copy the U.S. blindly in everything. Anonymous this blog is an intellectual discussion board not an advertising platform. I'm gonna have to delete your link advertising gay clubs in Ghana. Refrain from such going forward.

    I think it's commendable that the state of Iowa has been open minded and forward thinking to allow this law. This is America, Jack, people can do whatever the hell they want. Maybe Ghana may get there one day, but not today.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just have one question, can anyone please point to the Bible passage that says same sex marriage is a sin/not Biblical? Much Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1 Corinthians 6:9 (New International Version) "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders"

    I do know some homosexuals that are "devout" Christians and that are good people. The irony beats me.

    But as Steven Schmidt asserts, separation of The Church and the State is important in any secular state. But I stand by my view that my home country Ghana isn't ready for that kind of latitude. some day, maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe Hillary has already made a very profound point, invoking spirituality and legality into the debate. I am not in favor of gay marriages (and i don't hate gays, either), purely on religious grounds--that is not to say, however, that we have to impose a universal moral code on others who want to express their sexual feelings in a particular way. Injecting legality, particularly, into the gay marriage debate is laughable, at best.

    Our problem, in trying to join this debate, is creating the impression as if there is ONE sexual standard in which people have to express themselves. We've not had any convincing answers as to whether being gay (or straight) is genetic or an after-development. For me, that is one of the greatest disservice that our intellectuals have done to us.

    Indeed, judging by the current political and legal climate in Ghana (where i come from), including many other countries, the delusional impression is created as if there are no gays, or everyone is straight. Hypocrisy! As a result, politicians and other civil society organizations believe that laws are the most productive ways of regulating sexual behavior. We risk making the mistake of turning people into clones if we continue with this particular mindset.

    I don't believe that we need to legislate on sexual matters, in the same way i don't believe that morality should be universally determined. Note that i am not promoting any kind of legal abeyance. I think, strongly, that each society has its peculiar cultural and religious traditions that shape and define how such issues are handled. We've already suffered from a neo-liberal global order to be subjected to another kind of global legislation on gay marriages.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Etse - FYI
    In addition to the verse DK gave:

    New American Standard Bible (NASB)
    Leviticus 18:22 :You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

    Leviticus 20:13: If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.

    Romans 1:27 : ...and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

    afeseh.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks Godwin, you present compelling support to the views expressed by DK and Afeseh. The values that gay couples exhibit are no different from what you find in heterosexual marriages.
    In fact can you imagine Giuliani speaking against gay marriage after three failed ‘normal’ marriages? So in essence the argument that same sex marriage prevents procreation, destroys the marriage institution, isn’t a good environment to raise children or discourages procreation and immorality does fall apart. I guess what draws the line is the Biblical/Christian notions of marriage.

    So perhaps as I mentioned earlier we should "live and let live" or as Afeseh puts it we should “pray for the grace to love gay men and women with all the love that any man can have... they need love and light, not judgment from anybody whomsoever except God.”

    ReplyDelete
  11. ...by virtue of our up-bring we will be aligned to the left or to the right.In anycase the votes against same sex marriages in reference to psycological,health, social and religious studies stack up high against any other.

    It will not be right to allow same sex couples to adopt children because it infringes on their right to a certain life.They do not make the choice at that stage so if the state should make that choice on their behalf,i deem it wrong!How ever i do respect peoples choices and everyone has the right to live which ever life suits them(on earth)....after that JUDGMENT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unfortunately, gay marriages are going to be legalized. Very tragic but not at all a surprise. It's scary the kind of infleunce that gay people have in the corridors of law-making. In my opinion, a big mistake was made when "gayneess" was accepted as "normal". I don't really understand when people say that they were born gay. Is it a genetic defect?
    I think all of this is stemmed out of man's insatiable lust. I just don't see how a man can find comfort and warmth in another man's arms. Same goes for the women. Its just beyond my understanding. Even lower animals have the brains to know that male:female and not male:male or female:female. If you are a christian, you know that there are many scriptures that condem this act. Even if you are atheist you should know that nothing good comes out of destroying the natural order of things and the natural order is for male to be with female.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmmm, very interesting points from anonymous right above, but who establishes the natural order. haven' things we've known to be right been proven wrong after a while? did't people marry their siblings in the old testament? maybe its just a natural order of evolution.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not finished , the state should focus on feeding the hungry and providing shelter to the homeless and not on the sexual activities of its citizens!

    Finished now.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well said Nii. If so why does the gay and lesbian society seek public or state sanctioning of their actions...and why are those who believe in heterosexual marriage so concerned about what people do in their bedrooms considering that it wouldn’t affect them directly.

    However I agree with you that as far as prioritization is concerned government needs to concentrate on more pressings needs of its citizens

    ReplyDelete
  16. Here is something I came across recently that might add an extra dimension to your thoughts. Called the “Wisdom of repugnance,” it is a fundamental human reaction of aversion/repugnance toward something that we find morally unacceptable. Issues such as child pornography, rape etc command almost universal condemnation because they strongly appeal to our basic senses of what is right/wrong. It could be argued that this moral guidance has contributed (rightly, in many cases) to our laws and social stances on such issues. But what happens when such moral repugnance is also not accompanied by strong reason? In the issue of child pornography, apart from our moral aversion, it is a violation of human rights/exploitation of a minor. However, in the issue of inter-religious/interracial marriages (which, by the way, is still a huge no-no in large sections of the world), laws based on such aversion have become void because these predate on the choices of an individual. Similarly, in the case of premarital sex, though morally it is unacceptable to many, there cannot be a law prohibiting it since it is the informed choice of consenting individuals. The question I therefore ask is, are we looking at same-sex marriage through similar moral lenses? If we are, are these morals based on strong reason? What would happen to a world where same-sex marriage was universally legalized? Would society degrade as we assume it to do?

    If you would like to read more about "wisdom of repugnance," read http://www.biotech.iastate.edu/publications/bioethics_outreach/Bioethics_in_Brief/09may.html

    ReplyDelete